Leapwork, Perfecto, Applitools, Mabl, Testim and Tricentis are ready-made commercial platforms, and most of them will not tell you the price until you book a call. Here is the same comparison with our numbers published.
Every product here is a finished commercial platform with its own interface and support. Most are focused on web and mobile; the spread starts to show once you need more than that.
| Feature | ReTibe | Leapwork | Perfecto | Applitools | Mabl | Testim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No-code / low-code interface | JSON + visual | Visual | Partial | Partial | Visual | Visual |
| Telegram bot testing | Full emulation | No | No | No | No | No |
| AI analysis of group chats | Unique | No | No | No | No | No |
| Autonomous AI agent | Writes and maintains | No | No | No | Generation | Maintenance |
| MCP server for coding agents | 22 tools | No | No | No | No | No |
| Web testing | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile testing | 16 emulated | Partial | Real devices | Partial | Partial | Partial |
| API testing | REST + GraphQL | Partial | Yes | No | Yes | Partial |
| GraphQL testing | Query, mutation, sub | No | Partial | No | Partial | No |
| Visual regression | Baseline / diff | Partial | Yes | Best in class | Yes | Yes |
| Security scanner | 17 categories | Integrations | Integrations | No | Integrations | No |
| SEO analysis | Links, sitemap, robots | No | No | No | No | No |
| Accessibility (a11y) | axe-core + Lighthouse | Partial | Yes | Yes | Yes | Partial |
| Performance testing | Core Web Vitals | Partial | Yes | No | Yes | Partial |
| Load testing lite | RPS, P95, error rate | No | Separate | No | No | No |
| Multi-browser | 3 engines | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Data-driven testing | CSV, JSON, inline | Yes | Yes | Partial | Yes | Yes |
| Run history and analytics | Timeline, heatmap, flakiness | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Recording mode | Browser to JSON | Visual | Yes | SDK | Yes | Yes |
| Testing calendar | Built-in | Via CI | Via CI | No | Yes | Via CI |
| Figma comparison | Pixel-perfect diff | No | No | Partial | No | No |
| Jira issue on failure | Bug with screenshots | Yes | Yes | Partial | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD integration | CLI + REST + JUnit | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| ERP integrations (SAP, Oracle) | No | Yes | Partial | No | No | No |
| Cloud real-device lab | 16 emulated | Partial | Large library | No | Partial | Partial |
| Published price | On the site | On request | On request | On request | On request | On request |
| Free plan, not a trial | Forever | Trial | Trial | Trial | Trial | Trial |
| Russian interface | Full | No | No | No | No | No |
Competitor capabilities are as marketed for their standard offering. Several can reach further through paid add-ons or integrations, which is the cost this table does not show.
If your problem is exactly the thing one of these was built for, buy that one. We are the better answer when the problem spans several of them.
Web, API, Telegram and an AI agent in one place.
Telegram bot testing, AI chat analysis, autonomous agent, MCP connector, published low price
Fewer deep enterprise features, though the list keeps growing
Visual flow builder aimed at business users.
Visual builder, SAP and Oracle integrations
High price, no Telegram testing
Testing on physical devices at scale.
Large real-device library, mature cloud infrastructure
Very high price, no Telegram testing
Visual diffs as the entire product.
The leader in visual testing, best-in-class AI for UI diffs
Visual testing only, high price
Test generation with a gentle learning curve.
AI test generation, easy to pick up
High price, no Telegram testing
Keeping an existing suite from going red.
AI for test maintenance, self-healing selectors
High price, no Telegram testing
Wide coverage for a large organisation.
Comprehensive coverage, deep integrations
Very high price, complex rollout, no Telegram testing
Not just a runner: the structures a real QA function needs to keep a suite maintainable.
Structured manual passes with progress tracking and coverage statistics.
Credentials, URLs and selectors stored once and reused across scenarios.
Reusable setup and teardown: login, API calls, environment preparation.
Page logic in one place, so a selector change is a single edit.
Dev, staging and production isolated, with their own parameters and config.
Every scenario is checked before it runs, so a test that passes while verifying nothing gets caught rather than shipped.
| Capability | ReTibe | Leapwork | Mabl | Testim |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Checklists and statistics | Built-in | Partial | Partial | Partial |
| Test parameterisation | Built-in | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Fixtures, reusable functions | Built-in | Yes | Partial | Yes |
| Page Objects | Built-in | Partial | Partial | Yes |
| Environment management | dev, staging, prod | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Self-healing tests | Smart retry | Partial | Yes | Yes |
| AI test generation | Full agent | No | Yes | Partial |
| Test data management | Fixtures + CSV/JSON | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Team management and roles | 10 members on Corporate | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| White label | Corporate plan | Partial | No | No |
Every platform in this table is quote-only. The ranges below are the market estimates we work from, not official rates; treat them as a starting point and get your own quotes. Our number is exact, because it is on our pricing page.
| Platform | Entry | Mid tier | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| ReTibe | Free forever, 20 tests a month |
₽499 / month Professional, published |
₽4 999 / month Corporate, published |
| Leapwork | On request ~$1 000 to 2 000 / mo |
On request ~$3 000 to 5 000 / mo |
On request ~$10 000+ / mo |
| Perfecto | On request ~$1 500 to 3 000 / mo |
On request ~$5 000 to 8 000 / mo |
On request ~$15 000+ / mo |
| Applitools | On request ~$800 to 1 500 / mo |
On request ~$2 500 to 5 000 / mo |
On request ~$8 000+ / mo |
| Mabl | On request ~$1 000 to 2 000 / mo |
On request ~$3 000 to 6 000 / mo |
On request ~$10 000+ / mo |
| Testim | On request ~$900 to 1 800 / mo |
On request ~$2 500 to 5 000 / mo |
On request ~$8 000+ / mo |
| Tricentis | On request ~$2 000 to 4 000 / mo |
On request ~$6 000 to 10 000 / mo |
On request ~$20 000+ / mo |
Estimates, not quotes. The honest version: a large team with SAP integrations or a real-device lab may still need one of those platforms. For most product teams the gap is not close.
It reads your codebase, writes the strategy, generates scenarios, schedules them and reports back. Competitor AI mostly helps you record faster.
Twenty-two tools and three prompts, so Claude Code and any MCP client writes, validates and runs your tests from inside the editor.
Full Telegram Web user emulation, plus AI analysis of group chats with participants, topics and a summary. No enterprise platform does this.
Seventeen check categories in the same run, scored 0 to 100 with a fix and an OWASP reference for each finding. Competitors route this through integrations.
Side-by-side comparison with sliders between two runs, and pixel-perfect diffs against exported Figma frames.
Public rates, no hidden fees, no sales call before you know the number. Plus Russian interface and support throughout.
Modern open-source foundations and an optimised architecture, and no premium charged for the brand. The functionality is the product; the price is not a positioning exercise.
For most teams, yes: it covers the large majority of what these platforms do, and adds Telegram testing, AI chat analysis and the agent. For genuinely specific needs, like deep SAP and Oracle integration through Leapwork, a specialised tool may still be the right call.
If visual testing is all you need, Applitools is probably better at it. Our case is different: visual regression plus Telegram, API, security scanning and SEO in one place, at a fraction of the cost.
The Corporate plan covers up to 10 members with data isolation, roles and access rights. Beyond about a hundred users we would talk about a custom arrangement rather than pretend the standard plan fits.
A CLI and a REST API plug into GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins and Azure DevOps, with JUnit XML and Allure artefacts so your existing pipeline reads the results unchanged.
The free plan is enough to run a real flow on your own site this afternoon. No procurement, no card, no demo booking.